Since September 2016 I've been competing in the NASA Space Robotics Centennial Challenge (SRC). The challenge had a qualifying period and the final competition. I was one of the twenty teams from an international pool who qualified for the final competition. In mid-June the competitors ran their entries on a simulation in the cloud. The last few days, June 28 -30th capped the competition with a celebration at Space Center Houston, an education and entertainment facility next to the NASA Johnson Space Center.
On Thursday, the 29th, teams were invited to give presentations to the other teams, the NASA people who organized the challenge, and others. I used the opportunity to speak about my approach to the competition but also to raise the question of how an amateur roboticist, like myself, can make a meaningful contribution to robotics.
Two ways are through competitions like this and by contributing software to the Robot Operating System (ROS). There aren't always competitions to work and ROS contributions don't fulfill my desire. In part, ROS misses the mark because before adding a new, usable package, I need to develop something new and useful. Now perhaps there are existing topics that need software and ROS packaging but how do I learn about them?
And underlying issue for the amateur is knowing the state of the art in academia and industry. Often current academic material is behind paywalls. The amateur is also lacking in the background that lead to the current work.
One of the reasons for this entry, and a possible new blog with the title, is to see if a third way can be found or created.
Why the title "Autonomous Roboticist"? I started with "Amateur Roboticist" but wanted to add the term autonomous for clarity. I'm not interested in remote control 'robots' or combat 'robots', which are not robots, in my humble opinion.
The SRC was about a humanoid robot on Mars tasked with maintaining the equipment and habitat NASA had landed there. This might be before astronauts landed or after they left but prior to another teams arrival. With the time lag between the planets and the narrow bandwidth available the robot needed to be autonomous. Human direction would take a long time and might even be overrun by events. If communication were even possible. One of the scenarios in the SRC was to realign the high-speed communications dish that was disturbed by a storm.
The title "Amateur Autonomous Roboticist" or the permutation "Autonomous Amateur Roboticist" didn't really make sense. I then realized the two words, as used here, are close to being synonyms. An amateur is separate from established venues, i.e. is autonomous. I amateur from the title resulting in a play on the word autonomous. I want to work autonomously on autonomous robots.
How?I don't know.
One possible means is through affiliation with an academic group. Industry is usually precluded because of legal issues of employment, labor laws, and intellectual property ownership. They may exist with academia but there is more flexibility.
Define the Problem
If you're addressing a problem, it's useful to define the problem. Here's a list of the barrier items:
- What is the state of the art (SOTA)?
- What is needed to advance the SOTA?
- How can the necessary research material be obtained?
- How can it be translated into non-academic language, if necessary?
About #4, an example is the use of AI in games versus robots. A specific example is the use of Behavior Trees, which I used in the competition. The academic material is dense and loaded with math which the gaming version is not. How does something similar happen to other material?
There are other issues, I'm sure. This is just a start.
Where can we go from here?
Post a Comment